If you think the topic of pricing is sticky for consultants in general, try being a consultant to Community Benefit Organizations!

In the business world, clients might ask you to reduce your fee, but would they even consider asking you to do the work for free?  And yet Community Benefit Consultants face that situation all the time!

“Nonprofit” / Community Benefit Consultants also face questions like these: Which is more effective – hourly or project fees or “value-based” pricing? Are client expectations realistic? How much do we do at a discount or pro bono vs. getting paid for the value we provide?

This month’s chat will focus on the various aspects of pricing specifically as it relates to the work of consultants to Community Benefit Organizations.

  • What is the thinking behind your pricing strategy?
  • How do you explain your pricing approach to clients?
  • Have you changed strategies? If so, why?
  • If you have changed your pricing strategy, how did you explain that to clients? How did they respond? What was effective in moving clients to your new way or pricing?
  • Has the economy affected your pricing strategy? What has changed?
  • Is there a pricing strategy you would like to be using but are not using now? What is stopping you from using it? What would need to be in place for you to adopt that strategy?

In preparing for this chat, the following links are informative, creative, and will hopefully get your juices flowing.

A proactive Pro Bono policy: Will Carol Work for Free?

For those who have trouble saying No: The Best Denial Letter of All Time

We look forward to an energizing discussion on Tuesday, October 20th at 1pm US Pacific time!

P.S. There is one last thing – a request we hope everyone will respect: Please DO NOT DISCUSS specific rates (such as, “I charge $100 for X – what do you charge?” ) In the US, such discussion could be construed as an attempt at price-fixing. Some may argue that such discussion would not cross that line, however, we have had attorney after attorney over the years strongly discourage such online discussion.

Bottom line, the specific rates are not nearly as important as the reasoning behind those rates, which will be the most meaningful aspects of this chat.

Many many thanks to Debra Askanase for suggesting this topic and for drafting the sample questions above. We look forward to having @AskDebra sharing her wisdom during this chat!

Thanks also to @RuthAnnHarnisch for the link to the Denial letter!